Hi Geert,
On Fri, 2017-01-20 at 15:08 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Add optional support for the Reset Control feature of the Renesas Clock
> Pulse Generator / Module Standby and Software Reset module on R-Car
> Gen2, R-Car Gen3, and RZ/G1 SoCs.
Is there a reason to make this optional?
> This allows to reset SoC devices using the Reset Controller API.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
Looks good to me,
Acked-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Just a small issue below,
> ---
> drivers/clk/renesas/renesas-cpg-mssr.c | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 122 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/renesas/renesas-cpg-mssr.c b/drivers/clk/renesas/renesas-cpg-mssr.c
> index f1161a585c57e433..ea4af714ac14603a 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/renesas/renesas-cpg-mssr.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/renesas/renesas-cpg-mssr.c
[...]
> +static int cpg_mssr_reset(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> + unsigned long id)
> +{
> + struct cpg_mssr_priv *priv = rcdev_to_priv(rcdev);
> + unsigned int reg = id / 32;
> + unsigned int bit = id % 32;
> + u32 bitmask = BIT(bit);
Here you have a bitmask = BIT(bit) variable.
> + unsigned long flags;
> + u32 value;
> +
> + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "reset %u%02u\n", reg, bit);
> +
> + /* Reset module */
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->rmw_lock, flags);
> + value = readl(priv->base + SRCR(reg));
> + value |= bitmask;
Here you use it.
> + writel(value, priv->base + SRCR(reg));
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->rmw_lock, flags);
> +
> + /* Wait for at least one cycle of the RCLK clock (@ ca. 32 kHz) */
> + udelay(35);
> +
> + /* Release module from reset state */
> + writel(bitmask, priv->base + SRSTCLR(reg));
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int cpg_mssr_assert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev, unsigned long id)
> +{
> + struct cpg_mssr_priv *priv = rcdev_to_priv(rcdev);
> + unsigned int reg = id / 32;
> + unsigned int bit = id % 32;
Here you haven't.
> + unsigned long flags;
> + u32 value;
> +
> + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "assert %u%02u\n", reg, bit);
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->rmw_lock, flags);
> + value = readl(priv->base + SRCR(reg));
> + writel(value | BIT(bit), priv->base + SRCR(reg));
Here you don't.
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->rmw_lock, flags);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int cpg_mssr_deassert(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> + unsigned long id)
> +{
> + struct cpg_mssr_priv *priv = rcdev_to_priv(rcdev);
> + unsigned int reg = id / 32;
> + unsigned int bit = id % 32;
> +
> + dev_dbg(priv->dev, "deassert %u%02u\n", reg, bit);
> +
> + writel(BIT(bit), priv->base + SRSTCLR(reg));
And here ...
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int cpg_mssr_status(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev,
> + unsigned long id)
> +{
> + struct cpg_mssr_priv *priv = rcdev_to_priv(rcdev);
> + unsigned int reg = id / 32;
> + unsigned int bit = id % 32;
> +
> + return !!(readl(priv->base + SRCR(reg)) & BIT(bit));
And here neither.
I'd choose one variant over the other for consistency.
regards
Philipp
