On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 8:19 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Below is an experimental fix to intorduce pinctrl_start() that I've > tested with pinctrl-single. Then we should probably make all pin controller > drivers call pinctrl_start() to properly fix the issue of struct pinctrl_dev > handle not being initialized before driver functions are called. Hm I guess that could work, but can we keep pinctrl_register() with the old semantics and add a separate pinctrl_register_and_defer() for those who just wanna start it later by a separate call? Then we don't need any special flags. > Or do you guys have any better ideas? Not really. So you mean revert the previous patch and apply something like this instead? Yours, Linus Walleij
