Re: [PATCH V4] iio: adc: Add Renesas GyroADC driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/11/2017 02:11 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Marek,
> 
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 1:35 PM, Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> +Required properties for subnodes:
>>>> +- compatible:  Should be either of:
>>>> +               "fujitsu,mb88101a"
>>>> +                       - Fujitsu MB88101A compatible mode,
>>>> +                         12bit sampling, 4 channels
>>>
>>> For this one, we have to find a better representation in DT.
>>> Unlike the other two types, the MB88101A is a 4-channel ADC, and thus only
>>> a single instance is supported, providing 4 channels.
>>> Hence for MB88101A I suggest to just have a single node "adc", without a
>>> unit address or "reg" property.
>>
>> Hmmmmmm, this doesn't look quite right and it does make the binding
>> complicated and the MB88101A into quite the special snow flake. Also,
>> what if you have the MB88101A channels 0 and 1 connected only to ie.
>> gyroadc channels 2 and 3?
> 
> The gyroadc does not have multiple channel inputs, only a single input
> pin for serialized data. Supporting multiple channels is done using a
> 3-bit channel select (CHS) output signal.

Yep, it's kinda doing SPI behind the scenes.

> In mode 1, the 2 lsb CHS lines are to be connected to the C[01] channel
> select pins on the MB88101A.
> In other modes, I think you need an external multiplexer to select one of the
> 8 connected ADCs.

Yes.

> So while you cannot have non-standard channel wirings in mode 1,
> you can have a partial (or none at all) multiplexer and less than 8 ADCs,
> duplicating data to multiple channels.

Right

>> What about something like:
>>
>> adc2: adc@2 {
>>  reg = <0>;
>>  compatible = "fujitsu,mb88101a";
>>  vref-supply = <&vref_fujitsu_mb88101a>;
>> };
>>
>> adc3: adc@3 {
>>  reg = <3>;
>>  renesas,adc-master = <&adc2>;
>> };
> 
> Hmm, that can be used to describe duplicated channels, too ;-)

So we go with this ? I'm not completely sure about the new
"renesas,adc-master" property, are we OK with it ?

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux