Hi Wolfram, Thank you for the patch. It looks like I've missed it, sorry about that. On Tuesday 01 March 2016 17:37:34 Wolfram Sang wrote: > From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This change will also make Coverity happy by avoiding a theoretical NULL > pointer dereference; yet another reason is to use the above helper function > to tighten the code and make it more readable. > > Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Tested-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> and taken in my tree. > --- > > Compile tested only. I am on the road and can't test the multimedia drivers > because of no cables :( If someone could test it, that would be much > appreciated. Or I'll do it next week. The pattern worked for other drivers > I could actually test, though. > > drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c > b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c index > ed6006bf6bd893..ac95509e80bb7c 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c > @@ -318,7 +318,7 @@ static int rcar_du_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > init_waitqueue_head(&rcdu->commit.wait); > > rcdu->dev = &pdev->dev; > - rcdu->info = of_match_device(rcar_du_of_table, rcdu->dev)->data; > + rcdu->info = of_device_get_match_data(rcdu->dev); > > ddev = drm_dev_alloc(&rcar_du_driver, &pdev->dev); > if (!ddev) -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
