Hi Jacopo,
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:54 PM, jacopo@xxxxxxxxxx <jacopo@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> +struct max11100_state {
>>> + const struct max11100_chip_desc *desc;
>>> + struct spi_device *spi;
>>> + int vref_uv;
>>
>> unsi
>
> Was this a suggestion to turn "vref_uv" into unsigned?
It was a suggestion I started writing, and aborted improperly when noticing
the below ;-)
> As you can see in probe function it can get assigned to -EINVAL when a dummy
> regulator is returned from regulator-core.
> I had to make it signed for this reason
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
