On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:58:44AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Tuesday 29 Nov 2016 10:56:53 Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 11:04:39AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > > > The drm_bridge object models on- or off-chip hardware encoders and > > > provide an abstract control API to display drivers. In order to help > > > display drivers creating the right kind of drm_encoder object, expose > > > the type of the hardware encoder associated with each bridge. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart > > > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > DRM_MODE_ENCODER_BRIDGE. Problem solved, because in reality no one cares > > one iota about the encoder type. > > It's exposed to userspace though, are you 100% sure we won't break anything ? We've added DP, DSI, DPMST and DPI encoder types thus far, no one screamed. We should be fine I think. Connector types are a bit different, userspace (at least X) wants to pretty-print them for xrandr names. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation http://blog.ffwll.ch
