On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 05:49:29PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 03:11:45PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote: > > Hi Olof, Hi Kevin, Hi Arnd, > > > > Please consider these second round of Renesas ARM based SoC DT updates for v4.10. > > > > This pull request is based on a merge of: > > > > * The previous round of such requests, tagged as renesas-dt-for-v4.10, > > which I have already sent a pull-request for. > > * The rzg-clock-defs tag of Geert Uytterhoeven's renesas-driver's tree. > > This is to provide dependencies for adding the r8a7743 and r8a7745 SoCs. > > * The "Second Round of Renesas ARM Based SoC Drivers Updates for v4.10", > > tagged as renesas-drivers2-for-v4.10, which I have also sent a pull > > request for. This is included to provide dependencies for adding device > > nodes for PRR, and adding the r8a7743 and r8a7745 SoCs. > > Again, nack. And again, I don't understand why you create dependencies that > aren't needed. Please fix. Hi Olof, I agree that calling out PRR above was incorrect. Please disregard that. However, there are dependencies for adding r8a7743 and r8a7745 SoCs in the form of header files: * The rzg-clock-defs tag provides dt-bindings/clock/r8a774[35]-cpg-mssr.h * The renesas-drivers2-for-v4.10 tag provides dt-bindings/power/r8a774[35]-sysc.h The drivers branches are usually pretty light-weight. But this time it is a bit heavy and you rightly raised some questions about it. After some discussion with Geert we'd like to suggest that for future releases we provide a "driver-defs" branch which both driver code and DT can depend on. Thus avoiding pulling (non essential) driver changes into the DT branch. Unfortunately its a bit late to do that for v4.10 as the r8a7743 sysc driver and its defines were already accepted accepted together (renesas-drivers-for-v4.10 tag). So for this release we would be grateful if you could re-consider the renesas-drivers2-for-v4.10 tag given the feedback which Geert has provided. And in turn re-consider this pull request.
