Hi Laurent,
Thanks you for the feedback.
On 2016-11-12 03:46:11 +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Niklas,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Friday 11 Nov 2016 21:30:17 Niklas Söderlund wrote:
> > From: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > On some SoC there are no simple mapping of pins to bias register bits
> > and a lookup table is needed. This logic is already implemented in some
> > SoC specific drivers that could benefit from a generic implementation.
> >
> > Add helpers to deal with the lookup which later can be used by the SoC
> > specific drivers. The logic used to lookup are different from the one it
> > aims to replace, this is intentional. This new method reduces the memory
> > consumption at the cost of increased CPU usage and fix a bug where a
> > WARN() would incorrectly be triggered if the register offset is 0.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.h | 4 ++++
> > drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h | 6 ++++++
> > 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.c b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.c
> > index f3a8897..8e38df7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.c
> > @@ -389,6 +389,22 @@ int sh_pfc_config_mux(struct sh_pfc *pfc, unsigned
> > mark, int pinmux_type) return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +int sh_pfc_pin_to_bias_info(const struct sh_pfc_bias_info *pullups,
> > + unsigned int num, unsigned int pin,
> > + struct sh_pfc_bias_info *info)
>
> How about returning a const struct sh_pfc_bias_info * instead ? This would
> avoid copying the data into the *info argument. You could then rename pullups
> to info (I don't really like the pullups name as the table can contain
> pulldown information as well).
Good idea, I will update the patch in this way.
>
> > +{
> > + unsigned int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> > + if (pullups[i].pin == pin) {
> > + *info = pullups[i];
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > + }
> > +
> > + return WARN_ON_ONCE(-EINVAL);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int sh_pfc_init_ranges(struct sh_pfc *pfc)
> > {
> > struct sh_pfc_pin_range *range;
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.h b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.h
> > index 0bbdea58..d902cd2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.h
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/core.h
> > @@ -33,4 +33,8 @@ void sh_pfc_write_reg(struct sh_pfc *pfc, u32 reg,
> > unsigned int width, int sh_pfc_get_pin_index(struct sh_pfc *pfc, unsigned
> > int pin);
> > int sh_pfc_config_mux(struct sh_pfc *pfc, unsigned mark, int pinmux_type);
> >
> > +int sh_pfc_pin_to_bias_info(const struct sh_pfc_bias_info *pullups,
> > + unsigned int num, unsigned int pin,
> > + struct sh_pfc_bias_info *info);
> > +
> > #endif /* __SH_PFC_CORE_H__ */
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
> > b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h index 2345421..fc82b6d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/sh-pfc/sh_pfc.h
> > @@ -189,6 +189,12 @@ struct sh_pfc_window {
> > unsigned long size;
> > };
> >
> > +struct sh_pfc_bias_info {
> > + unsigned int pin;
>
> You should make this a u16, otherwise the structure will be padded to 8 bytes
> anyway, removing the benefit of storing reg and bit in 16 bits.
Thanks I did not know that, will update.
>
> > + u16 reg : 11;
> > + u16 bit : 5;
> > +};
> > +
> > struct sh_pfc_pin_range;
> >
> > struct sh_pfc {
--
Regards,
Niklas Söderlund
