Hi Ulrich,
(CC'ing the device tree mailing list - for real this time)
Thank you for the patch.
On Tuesday 18 Oct 2016 17:02:23 Ulrich Hecht wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ulrich Hecht <ulrich.hecht+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793-gose.dts | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793-gose.dts
> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793-gose.dts index a47ea4b..2606021 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793-gose.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7793-gose.dts
> @@ -390,6 +390,11 @@
> groups = "vin0_data24", "vin0_sync", "vin0_clkenb",
"vin0_clk";
> function = "vin0";
> };
> +
> + vin1_pins: vin1 {
> + groups = "vin1_data8", "vin1_clk";
> + function = "vin1";
> + };
> };
>
> ðer {
> @@ -515,6 +520,19 @@
> reg = <0x12>;
> };
>
> + composite-in@20 {
> + compatible = "adi,adv7180";
> + reg = <0x20>;
> + remote = <&vin1>;
> +
> + port {
> + adv7180: endpoint {
> + bus-width = <8>;
> + remote-endpoint = <&vin1ep>;
> + };
> + };
As explained before, you need to update the ADV7180 DT bindings first to
document ports. I've discussed this with Hans last week, and we agreed that DT
should model physical ports. Unfortunately the ADV7180 comes in four different
packages with different feature sets that affect ports.
ADV7180 K CP32 Z 32-Lead Lead Frame Chip Scale Package
ADV7180 B CP32 Z 32-Lead Lead Frame Chip Scale Package
ADV7180 WB CP32 Z 32-Lead Lead Frame Chip Scale Package
ADV7180 B CP Z 40-Lead Lead Frame Chip Scale Package
ADV7180 WB CP Z 40-Lead Lead Frame Chip Scale Package
ADV7180 K ST48 Z 48-Lead Low Profile Quad Flat Package
ADV7180 B ST48 Z 48-Lead Low Profile Quad Flat Package
ADV7180 WB ST48 Z 48-Lead Low Profile Quad Flat Package
ADV7180 B ST Z 64-Lead Low Profile Quad Flat Package
ADV7180 WB ST Z 64-Lead Low Profile Quad Flat Package
W tells whether the part is qualified for automotive applications. It has no
impact from a software point of view. K and B indicate the temperature range,
and also have no software impact. The Z suffix indicates that the part is RoHS
compliant (they all are) and also has no impact.
Unfortunately the W and K/B qualifiers come before the package qualifier. I'm
not sure whether we could simply drop W, K/B and W and specify the following
compatible strings
- adv7180cp32
- adv7180cp
- adv7180st48
- adv7180st
or if we need more compatible strings that would match the full chip name.
Feedback on that from the device tree maintainers would be appreciated.
Regardless of what compatible strings end up being used, the bindings should
document 3 or 6 input ports depending on the model, and one output port. You
can number the input ports from 0 to 2 or 0 to 5 depending on the model and
the output port 3 or 6. Another option would be to number the output port 0
and the input ports 1 to 3 or 1 to 6 depending on the model. That would give a
fixed number for the output port across all models, but might be a bit
consuming as most bindings number input ports before output ports.
For the Gose board you should then add one composite connector to the device
tree ("composite-video-connector") and connect it to port 0 of the
ADV7180WBCP32.
> + };
> +
> hdmi@39 {
> compatible = "adi,adv7511w";
> reg = <0x39>;
> @@ -622,3 +640,21 @@
> };
> };
> };
> +
> +/* composite video input */
> +&vin1 {
> + pinctrl-0 = <&vin1_pins>;
> + pinctrl-names = "default";
> +
> + status = "okay";
> +
> + port {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + vin1ep: endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&adv7180>;
> + bus-width = <8>;
> + };
> + };
> +};
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
