Hi Sergei,
On Fri, Oct 7, 2016 at 12:02 PM, Sergei Shtylyov
<sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 10/7/2016 11:33 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>>> Add minimal support for the RZ/G1M (R8A7743) SoC.
>>>> Based on the original (and large) patch by Dmitry Shifrin
>>>> <dmitry.shifrin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks, I have queued this up.
>>
>>
>> I'd like to see this patch rebased on top of "[PATCH] ARM: shmobile:
>> Consolidate R8A779[234] machine definitions".
>
>
> R87743 is analogous to R8A7791, not R8A779[234], not sure how it is
> connected to your patch.
The comment
+ /*
+ * R8A7790 and R8A7791 can't be handled here as long as they need SMP
+ * initialization fallback.
+ */
is not about r8a7790/r8a7791 in se, but about backward compatibility support
for DTBs without APMU nodes and CPU enable-methods.
For new SoCs, we mandate the presence of these in the DTB.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
