On Fri, Sep 23, 2016 at 09:09:07AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 11:32 PM, Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/r7s72100-rskrza1.dts | 4 ++++
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r7s72100-rskrza1.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r7s72100-rskrza1.dts
> > index e5dea5b..548b51f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r7s72100-rskrza1.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r7s72100-rskrza1.dts
> > @@ -56,6 +56,10 @@
> > };
> > };
> >
> > +&sdhi1 {
> > + status = "okay";
>
> On all other boards, we have the bus-width property in the board-specific
> .dts instead of in the SoC-specific .dtsi.
I'd like us to be consistent as much as possible.
But I do wonder why it has been added as a board property.
> > +};
> > +
> > &scif2 {
> > status = "okay";
> > };
