RE: [PATCH] clk: renesas: rz: Select EXTAL vs USB clock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Geert,

On Aug 29, 2016, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Instead of hard coding EXTAL only, check if EXTAL was specified. If 
>> not, then assume the USB clock is used as the main system clock.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chris Brandt <chris.brandt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> What's the rationale behind this change?


I'm thinking about beyond Renesas boards. People are making RZ/A1 boards with just the USB clock to save on BOM costs since 384MHz vs 400MHz is not enough of a drop to care about.
And of course, having someone make this kind of selection in the DT is better than forcing them to hack the clock file.



Chris




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux