Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH 1/xx][sample] ASoC: add COMPONENT_FUNC() macro for snd_soc_component_driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Lars

Thank you for your feedback

> > snd_soc_component_driver requests some struct xxx, and int num_xxx.
> > To make initialize easy, this patch adds COMPONENT_FUNC() macro.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  include/sound/soc.h | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/sound/soc.h b/include/sound/soc.h
> > index 6144882..41c21f9 100644
> > --- a/include/sound/soc.h
> > +++ b/include/sound/soc.h
> > @@ -795,6 +795,9 @@ struct snd_soc_component_driver {
> >  	int probe_order;
> >  	int remove_order;
> >  };
> > +#define COMPONENT_FUNC(name, func)		\
> > +	.name		= func,			\
> > +	.num_##name	= ARRAY_SIZE(func)
> 
> I'd avoid like to a void this kind of macro. Sure it slightly reduces
> boilerplate code, but it is difficult to parse for both humans as well as
> machines. Makes the code much less intuitive to understand and also breaks
> automated scripts.

Thanks, and yes agree.
Now, I'm creating many patches without above macro.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux