Re: [alsa-devel] Question about struct snd_soc_dai() :: cpu_dai->codec

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 10:51:26PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 07:57:05AM +0200, Takashi Iwai wrote:

> > For unloading the module, yes, it should have been prevented by
> > managing the module refcount.  However, unbinding can't be stopped by
> > that.  It's a known problem.

> Oh yes, unload is an issue. Are these any solutions to prevent this?

> In core, should we de-register the card if one of the components exits. The
> .remove should be called for the driver, thus triggering unregister?

That's the theory but it's full of holes at the minute.  Someone needs
to sit down and fix all the holes in there.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux