On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:01:09AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > Current simple-card is creating dai_link->name / dai_link->stream_name. > These are based on CPU + Codec name. > It can be "fe.CPU" or "be.Codec" if it was DPCM. > This patch adds simple card common function for it. This looks like it's about putting DPCM into the DT. Given that DPCM is very much an implementation detail we're trying to get rid of this seems like it's going in the wrong direction. What's the intended use?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
