Hi Chris,
Thank you for the patch.
On Friday 17 Jun 2016 09:25:23 Chris Wilson wrote:
> Up to now, the recommendation was for drivers to call drm_dev_register()
> followed by drm_connector_register_all(). Now that
> drm_connector_register() is safe against multiple invocations, we can
> move drm_connector_register_all() to drm_dev_register() and not suffer
> from any backwards compatibility issues with drivers not following the
> more rigorous init ordering.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: linux-renesas-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c | 5 -----
> 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c index 48ec4b6e8b26..36d390093c92
> 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c
> @@ -278,7 +278,6 @@ static int rcar_du_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct rcar_du_device *rcdu = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> struct drm_device *ddev = rcdu->ddev;
>
> - drm_connector_unregister_all(ddev);
> drm_dev_unregister(ddev);
>
> if (rcdu->fbdev)
> @@ -360,10 +359,6 @@ static int rcar_du_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> if (ret)
> goto error;
>
> - ret = drm_connector_register_all(ddev);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - goto error;
> -
> DRM_INFO("Device %s probed\n", dev_name(&pdev->dev));
>
> return 0;
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
