On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 01:29:43PM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 04:35:21PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > > i2c9 = "i2cexio1"; > > > i2c10 = "i2chdmi"; > > > i2c11 = "gpioi2c"; > > > + i2c12 = "i2cpwr"; > > > > To make it easier for users, we should maybe group them? > > > > i2c8+9: additional gpio busses > > i2c10-13: i2cexioX > > Should we also group gpioi2cX? That's what I meant with "additional gpio busses" :) I assume we only need 2 on lager.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
