Hi Magnus,
Thank you for the patch.
I agree with the comment that Geert made on v1, and I haven't seen you
replying to it or addressing it.
Quoting Geert,
"I think this should be handled in drivers/iommu/of_iommu.c:of_iommu_init()
instead, cfr. commit 3e5dd6f6e690048d ("clk: Ignore disabled DT clock
providers")."
On Monday 06 Jun 2016 12:58:22 Magnus Damm wrote:
> From: Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The ->xlate() call gets invoked even though the iommu
> device has status = "disabled" in DT, so make sure we
> skip over disabled devices.
>
> In my mind it would make sense to have this at some
> shared level, but I guess some users may want to
> configure the iommu regardless of DT state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Changes since V1:
> - Reworked slightly to fit on top of updated patch order
>
> drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- 0017/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c
> +++ work/drivers/iommu/ipmmu-vmsa.c 2016-06-06 10:58:18.530607110 +0900
> @@ -1001,7 +1001,13 @@ static struct iommu_group *ipmmu_device_
> static int ipmmu_of_xlate_dma(struct device *dev,
> struct of_phandle_args *spec)
> {
> - /* dummy callback to satisfy of_iommu_configure() */
> + /* If the IPMMU device is disabled in DT then return error
> + * to make sure the of_iommu code does not install ops
> + * even though the iommu device is disabled
> + */
> + if (!of_device_is_available(spec->np))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> return 0;
> }
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
