On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 03:10:40PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Friday 06 May 2016 09:21:25 Simon Horman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 02:20:10PM +1000, Simon Horman wrote: > > > Hi Olof, Hi Kevin, Hi Arnd, > > > > > > Please consider these Renesas ARM64 based SoC DT PM Domain updates for v4.7. > > > > > > This pull requests is based on a merge of: > > > > > > * "[GIT PULL] Second Round of Renesas ARM Based SoC R-Car SYSC Updates for > > > v4.7", tagged as renesas-rcar-sysc2-for-v4.7, which you have already > > > pulled > > > * "[GIT PULL] Second Round of Renesas ARM64 Based SoC DT Updates for v4.7", > > > tagged as renesas-arm64-dt2-for-v4.7, which I have sent a pull request > > > for. > > > > > > The reason for the somewhat tedious base on > > > renesas-rcar-sysc2-for-v4.7, which provides driver changes, > > > is a hard run-time dependency. > > > > > > I also have a similar set of changes for ARM (32-bit) which I will send > > > separately. > > > > I am wondering if this pull-request might have slipped through the cracks. > > > > FWIW, all other pull requests I have submitted for v4.7 have been pulled > > (thanks!) including a similar pull-request for ARM (32-bit) which is > > present in the next/late branch of the arm-soc tree. > > > > I do not plan to send any more non-fix pull requests for v4.7. > > And at this stage I am not aware of any fixes for v4.7. > > > > Indeed it did, thanks for the reminder! I've put it on my stack now > and should start doing merges later today when I'm through my mail. Great, thanks! I see that it has now been pulled.
