Hi Sergei,
On Tuesday 26 Apr 2016 21:09:10 Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 04/26/2016 12:36 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Turn the helper into a function that can retrieve crop and compose
> > selection rectangles.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> > <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_entity.c | 24 ++++++++++++++++++++----
> > drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_entity.h | 6 +++---
> > drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_rpf.c | 7 ++++---
> > 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_entity.c
> > b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_entity.c index
> > f60d7926d53f..8c49a74381a1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_entity.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/platform/vsp1/vsp1_entity.c
> > @@ -87,12 +87,28 @@ vsp1_entity_get_pad_format(struct vsp1_entity *entity,
> >
> > return v4l2_subdev_get_try_format(&entity->subdev, cfg, pad);
> >
> > }
> >
> > +/**
> > + * vsp1_entity_get_pad_selection - Get a pad selection from storage for
> > entity + * @entity: the entity
> > + * @cfg: the configuration storage
> > + * @pad: the pad number
> > + * @target: the selection target
> > + *
> > + * Return the selection rectangle stored in the given configuration for
> > an
> > + * entity's pad. The configuration can be an ACTIVE or TRY configuration.
> > The + * selection target can be COMPOSE or CROP.
> > + */
> >
> > struct v4l2_rect *
> >
> > -vsp1_entity_get_pad_compose(struct vsp1_entity *entity,
> > - struct v4l2_subdev_pad_config *cfg,
> > - unsigned int pad)
> > +vsp1_entity_get_pad_selection(struct vsp1_entity *entity,
> > + struct v4l2_subdev_pad_config *cfg,
> > + unsigned int pad, unsigned int target)
> >
> > {
> >
> > - return v4l2_subdev_get_try_compose(&entity->subdev, cfg, pad);
> > + if (target == V4L2_SEL_TGT_COMPOSE)
> > + return v4l2_subdev_get_try_compose(&entity->subdev, cfg, pad);
> > + else if (target == V4L2_SEL_TGT_CROP)
> > + return v4l2_subdev_get_try_crop(&entity->subdev, cfg, pad);
> > + else
> > + return NULL;
>
> How about *switch* instead?
That's certainly an option. It don't think it would make a big difference, but
I'll change it nonetheless. I won't post a new of the series now just for that
change though, but I'll include it when I'll do.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
