Hi Arnd,
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:12 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tuesday 26 April 2016 09:30:45 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> Commit 93fafa81cad3da9c ("Merge branches 'next/dt' and 'next/dt64' into
>> for-next") accidentally re-added the line
>>
>> clock-output-names = "can_clk";
>>
>> to arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi, which was removed in commit
>> f617604fe5d74b9c ("ARM: dts: r8a7791: Remove unnecessary
>> clock-output-names properties") before. It seems the same wrong
>> conflict resolution was made before in commit ef3b08c6c0d85753 ("Merge
>> branch 'fixes' into for-next").
>>
>> While this won't cause failures, can you please remove the offending
>> line?
>
> I've merged renesas-fixes-for-v4.6 into next/dt now to resolve
> the conflict there, otherwise Linus would have to do the same resolution
> during the merge window.
>
> Thanks for letting us know. If you want to verify my new resolution,
> please look at next/dt, which is the more important branch.
Thanks, but unfortunately your new merge resolution is incorrect, as it revived
the line
status = "disabled";
for the pcie_bus node.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
