Re: [PATCH 5/8] cpufreq: shmobile: Use generic platdev driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Viresh,

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 21-04-16, 15:04, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:43 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-dt-platdev.c
>> > @@ -29,6 +29,18 @@ static const struct of_device_id machines[] = {
>> >         { .compatible = "samsung,exynos5800", },
>> >  #endif
>> >
>>
>> I think an #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_RENESAS block wouldn't hurt, likewise
>> for the other SoCs.
>> Soon you'll have this file filled with lots of compatible values for random\
>> SoCs...
>
> This is going to be done once per boot and this shouldn't hurt. And for new
> platforms we may do things differently as they are going to use opp-v2 bindings.

I was mainly thinking about kernel size.
If this is done once per boot, the array should be __initconst,
(looking at the code
in next) which is fine as cpufreq_dt_platdev_init() is already __init.

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux