On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 09:23:10AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > Hi Simon, > > On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Simon Horman <horms@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 08:02:54AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 09:11:19AM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > >> > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 3:52 AM, Simon Horman > >> > <horms+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > > Hi Olof, Hi Kevin, Hi Arnd, > >> > > > >> > > Please consider these Renesas ARM based SoC fixes for v4.6. > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Allow serial to work once again on the Porter board (Revision B) which > >> > > does not have the oscillator in question mounted. > >> > > >> > Have you tested this on Porter? > >> > >> I don't have working access to a porter at this time. > >> > >> > I believe there's another change to be made for this revert to actually work, > >> > cfr. "[PATCH] ARM: dts: r8a7791: Don't disable referenced optional clocks" > >> > (https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/4/6/350) > >> > >> Ok, understood. > >> > >> Could someone verify that? > > > > I have added "ARM: dts: r8a7791: Don't disable referenced optional clocks" > > to the fixes-for-v4.6 branch and plan to push it in a fresh renesas-next > > tag a little later today. > > Thanks! > > I would queue > > ARM: dts: r8a7791: Don't disable referenced optional clocks > > before > > Revert "ARM: dts: porter: Enable SCIF_CLK frequency and pins" > > to preserve bisectability. So please reorder these two commits. Thanks, I have reordered the commits as you suggest. > > I would appreciate any review and/or testing on porter of that branch. > > I've provided my Reviewed-By in the original thread. Thanks, got it.
