Re: [PATCH 31/47] ARM: dts: r8a7794: Reference both DMA controllers in SCIFA nodes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 09:55:14PM +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Hi Olof,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 6:23 PM, Simon Horman <horms+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7794.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7794.dtsi
> >> index eacb2b291361..4256557ca041 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7794.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/r8a7794.dtsi
> >> @@ -296,8 +296,9 @@
> >>                 interrupts = <GIC_SPI 144 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> >>                 clocks = <&mstp2_clks R8A7794_CLK_SCIFA0>;
> >>                 clock-names = "fck";
> >> -               dmas = <&dmac0 0x21>, <&dmac0 0x22>;
> >> -               dma-names = "tx", "rx";
> >> +               dmas = <&dmac0 0x21>, <&dmac0 0x22>,
> >> +                      <&dmac1 0x21>, <&dmac1 0x22>;
> >> +               dma-names = "tx", "rx", "tx", "rx";
> >>                 power-domains = <&cpg_clocks>;
> >>                 status = "disabled";
> >>         };
> >
> > The names are no longer unique. So a get_<foo>_by_name() function no
> > longer can work as expected.
> 
> That's intentional, and a relic of how dma_request_slave_channel_compat()
> works: if e.g. the first "tx" channel can't be gotten (e.g. because
> the referenced
> DMAC instance ran out of channels), it will try the next one.

Hi Olof,

is the above acceptable to you?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Samsung SOC]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux