On 4 April 2016 at 17:17, Wolfram Sang <wsa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > + usleep_range(5000, 5500); >> >> Why do you need this delay/sleep? > > My datasheet says to wait at least 5ms before re-enabling the clock > after a voltage switch... > > Ah, found it in the core. It is doing it for 10ms. Maybe my search > pattern was not fuzzy enough ;) > > Okay, so this delay can go. > Thanks for the clarification. I will amend the patch, no need for you to send a new version! Kind regards Uffe
