On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 05:37:07PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This change will also make Coverity happy by avoiding a theoretical NULL > pointer dereference; yet another reason is to use the above helper function > to tighten the code and make it more readable. Applied, thanks -- ~Vinod