On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Add documentation for new separate CMT0 and CMT1 DT compatible strings
> for R-Car Gen2. These compat strings allow us to enable CMT1-specific
> features in the driver. The old compat strings will be deprecated in
> the not so distant future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>
> Changes since V2:
> - Added Acked-by from Rob
> - Removed Tested-by tag from DT binding patch - duh!
>
> Changes since V1:
> - Added Acked-by and Tested-by from Geert
> - Added Acked-by from Laurent
>
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/renesas,cmt.txt | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> --- 0002/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/renesas,cmt.txt
> +++ work/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/renesas,cmt.txt 2015-09-17 17:26:57.440513000 +0900
> @@ -36,6 +36,9 @@ Required Properties:
> (CMT1 on sh73a0 and r8a7740)
> This is a fallback for the above renesas,cmt-48-* entries.
>
> + - "renesas,cmt0-rcar-gen2" for 32-bit CMT0 devices included in R-Car Gen2.
> + - "renesas,cmt1-rcar-gen2" for 48-bit CMT1 devices included in R-Car Gen2.
(advancing a few months always means more comments ;-)
I'm wondering whether we should use e.g. "renesas,rcar-gen2-cmt0" instead?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
