On 16/02/16 07:12, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
Hi Dirk,
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 7:44 AM, Dirk Behme <dirk.behme@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[...]
As we don't have any CA53 in the device tree yet, and it was rejected to add
it, I'd think that we don't want these unused entries at the moment.
This is a preparatory step for adding the SYSC PM Domains.
I'd propose to add the CA53 entries, first. And then add their L2 cache
entries.
Based on the outcome of the discussion for the CA57 we have to see if we
want to add the unused cache-unified and cache-level, then, too.
These are specified by ePAPR, as I said before.
Remember, DT describes the hardware, not what Linux (or any other OS) is
using.
I completely agree and I mentioned the same in the other email.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
