On Tuesday 16 February 2016 01:08:18 Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Monday 15 February 2016 22:16:50 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: > > The Renesas R-Car System Controller provides power management for the > > CPU cores and various coprocessors, following the generic PM domain > > bindings in Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/power_domain.txt. > > > > This supports R-Car Gen1, Gen2, and Gen3. > > > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- [snip] > > > > .../bindings/power/renesas,sysc-rcar.txt | 87 +++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 87 insertions(+) create mode 100644 > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/renesas,sysc-rcar.txt > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/renesas,sysc-rcar.txt > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/renesas,sysc-rcar.txt new file > > mode 100644 > > index 0000000000000000..92ddc0da7b755215 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/renesas,sysc-rcar.txt > > @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ [snip] > > + - pm-domains: This node contains a hierarchy of PM Domain Nodes. > > Can't it be an issue that the node happens to have the same name as the > standard pm-domains property ? Scratch this, it's power-domains, not pm-domains, mybad. > > + Dependencies (e.g. parent SCUs should not be powered off while child > > CPUs > > + are on) should be reflected using subnodes. -- Regards, Laurent Pinchart
