Re: [PATCH v1] remoteproc: Add device awake calls in rproc boot and shutdown path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 3/13/2025 3:33 PM, Greg KH wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2025 at 02:42:10PM +0530, Souradeep Chowdhury wrote:
Gentle Reminder.


On 3/3/2025 2:38 PM, Souradeep Chowdhury wrote:
Add device awake calls in case of rproc boot and rproc shutdown path.
Currently, device awake call is only present in the recovery path
of remoteproc. If a user stops and starts rproc by using the sysfs
interface, then on pm suspension the firmware loading fails. Keep the
device awake in such a case just like it is done for the recovery path.

Signed-off-by: Souradeep Chowdhury <quic_schowdhu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
   drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 6 +++++-
   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index c2cf0d277729..908a7b8f6c7e 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -1916,7 +1916,8 @@ int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc)
   		pr_err("invalid rproc handle\n");
   		return -EINVAL;
   	}
-
+	
+	pm_stay_awake(rproc->dev.parent);
   	dev = &rproc->dev;
   	ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rproc->lock);
@@ -1961,6 +1962,7 @@ int rproc_boot(struct rproc *rproc)
   		atomic_dec(&rproc->power);
   unlock_mutex:
   	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
+	pm_relax(rproc->dev.parent);
   	return ret;
   }
   EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_boot);
@@ -1991,6 +1993,7 @@ int rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
   	struct device *dev = &rproc->dev;
   	int ret = 0;
+	pm_stay_awake(rproc->dev.parent);
   	ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&rproc->lock);
   	if (ret) {
   		dev_err(dev, "can't lock rproc %s: %d\n", rproc->name, ret);
@@ -2027,6 +2030,7 @@ int rproc_shutdown(struct rproc *rproc)
   	rproc->table_ptr = NULL;
   out:
   	mutex_unlock(&rproc->lock);
+	pm_relax(rproc->dev.parent);
   	return ret;
   }
   EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_shutdown);

<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read:
     https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>
Thanks for the instructions, corrected in the next version.





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux