Re: [PATCH 4/5] remoteproc: k3-r5: Use devm_ioremap_wc() helper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/4/24 5:11 AM, Beleswar Padhi wrote:
Use a device lifecycle managed ioremap helper function. This helps
prevent mistakes like unmapping out of order in cleanup functions and
forgetting to unmap on all error paths.

Signed-off-by: Beleswar Padhi <b-padhi@xxxxxx>
---
  drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c | 40 +++++-------------------
  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
index 2966cb210403..1a7681502f62 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_r5_remoteproc.c
@@ -1004,17 +1004,13 @@ static int k3_r5_reserved_mem_init(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
  	/* use remaining reserved memory regions for static carveouts */
  	for (i = 0; i < num_rmems; i++) {
  		rmem_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", i + 1);
-		if (!rmem_np) {
-			ret = -EINVAL;
-			goto unmap_rmem;
-		}
+		if (!rmem_np)
+			return -EINVAL;
rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(rmem_np);
  		of_node_put(rmem_np);
-		if (!rmem) {
-			ret = -EINVAL;
-			goto unmap_rmem;
-		}
+		if (!rmem)
+			return -EINVAL;
kproc->rmem[i].bus_addr = rmem->base;
  		/*
@@ -1029,12 +1025,11 @@ static int k3_r5_reserved_mem_init(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
  		 */
  		kproc->rmem[i].dev_addr = (u32)rmem->base;
  		kproc->rmem[i].size = rmem->size;
-		kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr = ioremap_wc(rmem->base, rmem->size);
+		kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr = devm_ioremap_wc(dev, rmem->base, rmem->size);
  		if (!kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr) {
  			dev_err(dev, "failed to map reserved memory#%d at %pa of size %pa\n",
  				i + 1, &rmem->base, &rmem->size);
-			ret = -ENOMEM;
-			goto unmap_rmem;
+			return -ENOMEM;
  		}
dev_dbg(dev, "reserved memory%d: bus addr %pa size 0x%zx va %pK da 0x%x\n",
@@ -1045,19 +1040,6 @@ static int k3_r5_reserved_mem_init(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
  	kproc->num_rmems = num_rmems;
return 0;
-
-unmap_rmem:
-	for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
-		iounmap(kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr);
-	return ret;
-}
-
-static void k3_r5_reserved_mem_exit(struct k3_r5_rproc *kproc)
-{
-	int i;
-
-	for (i = 0; i < kproc->num_rmems; i++)
-		iounmap(kproc->rmem[i].cpu_addr);
  }
/*
@@ -1285,10 +1267,8 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
  		}
ret = rproc_add(rproc);
-		if (ret) {
-			dev_err(dev, "rproc_add failed, ret = %d\n", ret);
-			goto err_add;
-		}
+		if (ret)
+			dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "rproc_add failed\n");

Did you mean to return the result of dev_err_probe() here? Without that
now anything between here and where err_add used to be will get run.
Might be more clear that this is correct by still doing a "goto out;"

Andrew

/* create only one rproc in lockstep, single-cpu or
  		 * single core mode
@@ -1333,8 +1313,6 @@ static int k3_r5_cluster_rproc_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
err_powerup:
  	rproc_del(rproc);
-err_add:
-	k3_r5_reserved_mem_exit(kproc);
  out:
  	/* undo core0 upon any failures on core1 in split-mode */
  	if (cluster->mode == CLUSTER_MODE_SPLIT && core == core1) {
@@ -1379,8 +1357,6 @@ static void k3_r5_cluster_rproc_exit(void *data)
  		mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox);
rproc_del(rproc);
-
-		k3_r5_reserved_mem_exit(kproc);
  	}
  }




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux