Question regarding optimisation of RPMsg round trip times on Xilinx ZynqMP hardware

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello everybody,

I need your help concerning an error that was returned while trying to
use the AMD Xilinx implementation of remoteproc. I hope that this is
the right place to ask for help.

I'm currently working on a project that requires Remoteproc and
RPMsg. The hardware I am working with is a Trenz SoM containing a
AMD Zynq UltraScale+ MPSoC, CG variant, DDR3 external RAM and a few
additional components.

One of the targets of the project is that the communication between
the RPU and the APU should happen under soft realtime conditions. The
issue with the communication examples provided by Xilinx is that they
use the external RAM for the buffers for RPMsg. This results in highly
non-deterministic communication delay jitter, which is most likely due
to the fact that DDR RAM is not suited for those applications.

Given that the SoC already has an On-Chip Memory that is designed for such
applications, I am curious whether changing the shared memory location
for RPMsg to reside inside of the OCM of the SoC result in a performance
boost. Do you have any experience with such performance benefits?

I'm currently developing a solution, trying to adopt the examples AMD
provides, but when trying to boot the fw image, Remoteproc complains that
it is unable to allocate the memory, saying the fw image size doesn't
fit the len request. This results in Remoteproc throwing error "-12",
which simply indicates that booting of the RPU failed. More information
isn't logged.

I have tried to read the documentation, but I can't really decide which
aspects I need to bear in mind when trying to adopt my code to use a
different memory region as a whole.

My previous attempts at circumventing this issue failed, resulting in
the error above.
A few of the things I've tried are:
- Changing the shared memory and the vring addresses to be inside of
the OCM
- Adding the OCM and the remoteproc buffers to the device tree
- Attempting to increase the requested carveout for the firmware

I hope this provides a sufficient overview of my situation. If you need
further information or logs in order to figure out what went wrong,
feel free to ask for that.

Thank you in advance and best regards,

Felix Kuhlmann





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux