On Sun, 15 Sept 2024 at 08:09, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 01:24:25PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 10:17:56AM -0600, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> >
> > > > - domain = iommu_domain_alloc(dev->bus);
> > > > - if (!domain) {
> > > > + domain = iommu_paging_domain_alloc(dev);
> > >
> > > I'm a little hesitant here. Function iommu_domain_alloc() passes NULL two the
> > > second argument of __iommu_domain_alloc() while iommu_paging_domain_alloc()
> > > provides a 'dev'. I don't have any HW to test on and I am not familiar enough
> > > with the IOMMU subsystem to confidently more forward.
> >
> > So long as dev is the device that will be initiating DMA this is a
> > correct change from the iommu subsystem perspective.
>
> This is the only call site left for iommu_domain_alloc() - we want to
> remove this API on the next cycle. Please take the patch
>
And I have no intentions of delaying things further. I will discuss
this with Bjorn later this week in Vienna.
> Thanks,
> Jason
