If an error occurs after mbox_request_channel() in k3_dsp_rproc_request_mbox(), mbox_free_channel() must be called, as already done in the remove function. Instead of adding an error handling path in the probe and changing all error handling in the function, add a new devm_add_action_or_reset() and simplify the error handling path of k3_dsp_rproc_request_mbox() and the .remove() function. Fixes: ea1d6fb5b571 ("remoteproc: k3-dsp: Acquire mailbox handle during probe routine") Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Andrew Davis <afd@xxxxxx> --- Compile tested only. Change in v3: - pass the correct variable to devm_add_action_or_reset() [Mathieu Poirier] - move the devm_add_action_or_reset() call just after mbox_request_channel() and simplify error handling in k3_dsp_rproc_request_mbox() - Because of these changes, remove previous R-b tag Change in v2: - fix the subject (cut'n'paste issue) [Andrew Davis] - add R-b tag v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/9485e127a00419c76cf13dbccf4874af395ef6ba.1725653543.git.christophe.jaillet@xxxxxxxxxx/ --- drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c | 14 +++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c index 8be3f631c192..f0da29fa7f60 100644 --- a/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/ti_k3_dsp_remoteproc.c @@ -224,6 +224,13 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_release(struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc) return ret; } +static void k3_dsp_free_channel(void *data) +{ + struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = data; + + mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox); +} + static int k3_dsp_rproc_request_mbox(struct rproc *rproc) { struct k3_dsp_rproc *kproc = rproc->priv; @@ -242,6 +249,10 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_request_mbox(struct rproc *rproc) return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(kproc->mbox), "mbox_request_channel failed\n"); + ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, k3_dsp_free_channel, kproc); + if (ret) + return ret; + /* * Ping the remote processor, this is only for sanity-sake for now; * there is no functional effect whatsoever. @@ -252,7 +263,6 @@ static int k3_dsp_rproc_request_mbox(struct rproc *rproc) ret = mbox_send_message(kproc->mbox, (void *)RP_MBOX_ECHO_REQUEST); if (ret < 0) { dev_err(dev, "mbox_send_message failed (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret)); - mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox); return ret; } @@ -741,8 +751,6 @@ static void k3_dsp_rproc_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) if (ret) dev_err(dev, "failed to detach proc (%pe)\n", ERR_PTR(ret)); } - - mbox_free_channel(kproc->mbox); } static const struct k3_dsp_mem_data c66_mems[] = { -- 2.46.0