On 05/09/2024 06:42, Jingyi Wang wrote: > > > On 9/4/2024 5:38 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 04/09/2024 10:33, Jingyi Wang wrote: >>> Document the QCS8275/QCS8300 SoC and its reference board QCS8300 RIDE. >>> QCS8300 is an Industrial Safe SoC, while QCS8275 is the Industrial >>> Non-Safe version which can share the same SoC dtsi and board DTS. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <quic_jingyw@xxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml | 8 ++++++++ >>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml >>> index c0529486810f..ccf9a166368f 100644 >>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml >>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/qcom.yaml >>> @@ -42,6 +42,8 @@ description: | >>> msm8996 >>> msm8998 >>> qcs404 >>> + qcs8275 >>> + qcs8300 >>> qcs8550 >>> qcm2290 >>> qcm6490 >>> @@ -895,6 +897,12 @@ properties: >>> - const: qcom,qcs404-evb >>> - const: qcom,qcs404 >>> >>> + - items: >>> + - enum: >>> + - qcom,qcs8300-ride >>> + - const: qcom,qcs8275 >> >> So the qcs8300 ride comes with non-safe SoC? >> >> Best regards, >> Krzysztof >> > Both QCS8275 and QCS8300 SoC can reference qcs8300 ride board. Could you > describe your suggestion in more detail? I did not suggest anything. I am confused that you claim that every qcs8300 is using the non-safe flavor of the SoC. I am fine with this but I want to understand it and be sure you will not change it next month when you learn what this means. Best regards, Krzysztof
