Re: [PATCH -next] hwspinlock: stm32: Add missing clk_disable_unprepare in stm32_hwspinlock_probe

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 2024/8/3 14:14, Gaosheng Cui wrote:
Add the missing clk_disable_unprepare() before return in
stm32_hwspinlock_probe().

Signed-off-by: Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/hwspinlock/stm32_hwspinlock.c | 5 ++++-
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwspinlock/stm32_hwspinlock.c b/drivers/hwspinlock/stm32_hwspinlock.c
index bb5c7e5f7a80..a4e3b9a9e29d 100644
--- a/drivers/hwspinlock/stm32_hwspinlock.c
+++ b/drivers/hwspinlock/stm32_hwspinlock.c
@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ static int stm32_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  	ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(dev, stm32_hwspinlock_disable_clk, pdev);
  	if (ret) {
  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to register action\n");
+		clk_disable_unprepare(hw->clk);
  		return ret;
  	}
@@ -112,8 +113,10 @@ static int stm32_hwspinlock_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  	ret = devm_hwspin_lock_register(dev, &hw->bank, &stm32_hwspinlock_ops,
  					0, STM32_MUTEX_NUM_LOCKS);
- if (ret)
+	if (ret) {
  		dev_err(dev, "Failed to register hwspinlock\n");
+		clk_disable_unprepare(hw->clk);
+	}

I don't think this is needed, because if the device initialization fails, stm32_hwspinlock_disable_clk() will be called to disable the clock automatically when the device releases its resources. Please check how devm_add_action_or_reset() work.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux