Re: [PATCH V2 2/2] soc: qcom: smp2p: Introduce tracepoint support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 6/11/2024 5:33 AM, Sudeepgoud Patil wrote:
This commit introduces tracepoint support for smp2p,
enabling logging of communication between local and remote processors.
The tracepoints include information about the remote processor ID,
remote subsystem name, negotiation details, supported features,
bit change notifications, and ssr activity.
These tracepoints are valuable for debugging issues between subsystems.

Signed-off-by: Sudeepgoud Patil <quic_sudeepgo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
...
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/trace-smp2p.h b/drivers/soc/qcom/trace-smp2p.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..833782460b57
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/trace-smp2p.h
@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2024 Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. All rights reserved.
+ */
+
+#undef TRACE_SYSTEM
+#define TRACE_SYSTEM qcom_smp2p
+
+#if !defined(__QCOM_SMP2P_TRACE_H__) || defined(TRACE_HEADER_MULTI_READ)
+#define __QCOM_SMP2P_TRACE_H__
+
+#include <linux/tracepoint.h>
+
+#define SMP2P_FEATURE_SSR_ACK 0x1

Now that I see it, redefining the the feature flag here seems a bit out of place. I'm not sure if it's worth kicking off a header file for this single define though.

+
+TRACE_EVENT(smp2p_ssr_ack,
+	TP_PROTO(unsigned int remote_pid, char *irq_devname),
+	TP_ARGS(remote_pid, irq_devname),
+	TP_STRUCT__entry(
+		__field(u32, remote_pid)
+		__string(irq_devname, irq_devname)
+	),
+	TP_fast_assign(
+		__entry->remote_pid = remote_pid;
+		__assign_str(irq_devname, irq_devname);
+	),
+	TP_printk("%d: %s: SSR detected, doing SSR Handshake",
+		__entry->remote_pid,
+		__get_str(irq_devname)
+	)
+);
+

I don't think we need to pass remote_pid into all of the traces if we have a unique name "irq_devname" to identify the remote now. We could remove remote_pid from all the trace event arguments.

We can probably drop the "doing SSR Handshake" part of this print. I think it can be assumed that we're doing the handshake once we've detected SSR.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux