On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 09:27:29AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/05/2024 00:58, Chris Lew wrote:
> > Add the hwlock property to remoteproc. This enables the remoteproc to
> > try and bust the smem hwspinlock if the remoteproc has crashed while
> > holding the hwspinlock.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Lew <quic_clew@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi
> > index 62a6e77730bc..a65a1679f003 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8650.dtsi
> > @@ -2878,6 +2878,7 @@ remoteproc_mpss: remoteproc@4080000 {
> >
> > qcom,smem-states = <&smp2p_modem_out 0>;
> > qcom,smem-state-names = "stop";
> > + hwlocks = <&tcsr_mutex 3>;
>
> lock #3 is used by smem, so this proves you are taking someone else's
> lock.
The lock is a shared resource, it's not "some else's lock".
Regards,
Bjorn
> I commented on this in the binding, but let's be specific:
>
> NAK, please carry:
>
> Nacked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
