Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Tue, 21 May 2024 at 12:52, <neil.armstrong@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> On 21/05/2024 11:45, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >> > Qualcomm platforms have different sets of the firmware files, which >> > differ from platform to platform (and from board to board, due to the >> > embedded signatures). Rather than listing all the firmware files, >> > including full paths, in the DT, provide a way to determine firmware >> > path based on the root DT node compatible. >> >> Ok this looks quite over-engineered but necessary to handle the legacy, >> but I really think we should add a way to look for a board-specific path >> first and fallback to those SoC specific paths. > > Again, CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER => delays. To me this also looks like very over-engineered, can you elaborate more why this is needed? Concrete examples would help to understand better. -- https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/ https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
