Re: [PATCH v7 6/6] remoteproc: qcom: enable in-kernel PD mapper

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 4/26/2024 6:36 PM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
On Sat, 27 Apr 2024 at 04:03, Chris Lew <quic_clew@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



On 4/24/2024 2:28 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
index 1d24c9b656a8..02d0c626b03b 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_adsp.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
   #include <linux/remoteproc.h>
   #include <linux/reset.h>
   #include <linux/soc/qcom/mdt_loader.h>
+#include <linux/soc/qcom/pd_mapper.h>
   #include <linux/soc/qcom/smem.h>
   #include <linux/soc/qcom/smem_state.h>

@@ -375,10 +376,14 @@ static int adsp_start(struct rproc *rproc)
       int ret;
       unsigned int val;

-     ret = qcom_q6v5_prepare(&adsp->q6v5);
+     ret = qcom_pdm_get();
       if (ret)
               return ret;

Would it make sense to try and model this as a rproc subdev? This
section of the remoteproc code seems to be focused on making specific
calls to setup and enable hardware resources, where as pd mapper is
software.

sysmon and ssr are also purely software and they are modeled as subdevs
in qcom_common. I'm not an expert on remoteproc organization but this
was just a thought.

Well, the issue is that the pd-mapper is a global, not a per-remoteproc instance


Both sysmon and ssr have some kind of global states that they manage too. Each subdev functionality tends to be a mix of per-remoteproc instance management and global state management.

If pd-mapper was completely global, pd-mapper would be able to instantiate by itself. Instead, instantiation is dependent on each remoteproc instance properly getting and putting references.

The pdm subdev could manage the references to pd-mapper for that remoteproc instance.

On the other hand, I think Bjorn recommended this could be moved to probe time in v4. The v4 version was doing the reinitialization-dance, but I think the recommendation could still apply to this version.


Thanks!
Chris


+     ret = qcom_q6v5_prepare(&adsp->q6v5);
+     if (ret)
+             goto put_pdm;
+
       ret = adsp_map_carveout(rproc);
       if (ret) {
               dev_err(adsp->dev, "ADSP smmu mapping failed\n");
@@ -446,6 +451,8 @@ static int adsp_start(struct rproc *rproc)
       adsp_unmap_carveout(rproc);
   disable_irqs:
       qcom_q6v5_unprepare(&adsp->q6v5);
+put_pdm:
+     qcom_pdm_release();

       return ret;
   }







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux