On Mittwoch, 24. April 2024 18:23:53 MESZ Luca Weiss wrote: > The first patch is for removing a bogus error warning I've noticed while > developing this on msm8226 - there the patches are also coming later for > this SoC since apcs is getting hooked up to cpufreq there also. > > Apart from usages from the qcom,smsm driver (patches coming!) all other > usages of the apcs mailbox now go via the mailbox driver - where one is > used, so some arm32 boards will continue using "qcom,ipc*" properties in > the short or long term. > > Only compile-tested apart from msm8953 (tested on sdm632-fairphone-fp3) > and msm8974 (tested on msm8974pro-fairphone-fp2), but I don't expect any > complications with this. I think I forgot to mention this, but the msm8974 patch depends on this series: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20240408-msm8974-apcs-v1-0-90cb7368836e@xxxxxxxxx/ > > Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > Luca Weiss (7): > rpmsg: qcom_smd: Don't print error during probe deferral > ARM: dts: qcom: msm8974: Use mboxes properties for APCS > arm64: dts: qcom: msm8916: Use mboxes properties for APCS > arm64: dts: qcom: msm8939: Use mboxes properties for APCS > arm64: dts: qcom: msm8953: Use mboxes properties for APCS > arm64: dts: qcom: msm8976: Use mboxes properties for APCS > arm64: dts: qcom: msm8994: Use mboxes properties for APCS > > arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom/qcom-msm8974.dtsi | 14 +++++++------- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8916.dtsi | 10 +++++----- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8939.dtsi | 4 ++-- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8953.dtsi | 10 +++++----- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8976.dtsi | 8 ++++---- > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8994.dtsi | 6 +++--- > drivers/rpmsg/qcom_smd.c | 3 ++- > 7 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) > --- > base-commit: 43173e6dbaa227f3107310d4df4a3bacd5e0df33 > change-id: 20240423-apcs-mboxes-12ee6c01a5b3 > > Best regards, >
