On 4/10/24 11:59 AM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 08, 2024 at 01:53:14PM -0700, Tanmay Shah wrote:
>> ZynqMP TCM information was fixed in driver. Now ZynqMP TCM information
>> is available in device-tree. Parse TCM information in driver
>> as per new bindings.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@xxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes in v14:
>> - Add Versal platform support
>> - Add Versal-NET platform support
>> - Maintain backward compatibility for ZynqMP platform and use hardcode
>> TCM addresses
>> - Configure TCM based on xlnx,tcm-mode property for Versal
>> - Avoid TCM configuration if that property isn't available in DT
>>
>> drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c | 173 ++++++++++++++++++------
>> 1 file changed, 132 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>> index 0f942440b4e2..504492f930ac 100644
>> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/xlnx_r5_remoteproc.c
>> @@ -74,8 +74,8 @@ struct mbox_info {
>> };
>>
>> /*
>> - * Hardcoded TCM bank values. This will be removed once TCM bindings are
>> - * accepted for system-dt specifications and upstreamed in linux kernel
>> + * Hardcoded TCM bank values. This will stay in driver to maintain backward
>> + * compatibility with device-tree that does not have TCM information.
>> */
>> static const struct mem_bank_data zynqmp_tcm_banks_split[] = {
>> {0xffe00000UL, 0x0, 0x10000UL, PD_R5_0_ATCM, "atcm0"}, /* TCM 64KB each */
>> @@ -300,36 +300,6 @@ static void zynqmp_r5_rproc_kick(struct rproc *rproc, int vqid)
>> dev_warn(dev, "failed to send message\n");
>> }
>>
>> -/*
>> - * zynqmp_r5_set_mode()
>> - *
>> - * set RPU cluster and TCM operation mode
>> - *
>> - * @r5_core: pointer to zynqmp_r5_core type object
>> - * @fw_reg_val: value expected by firmware to configure RPU cluster mode
>> - * @tcm_mode: value expected by fw to configure TCM mode (lockstep or split)
>> - *
>> - * Return: 0 for success and < 0 for failure
>> - */
>> -static int zynqmp_r5_set_mode(struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core,
>> - enum rpu_oper_mode fw_reg_val,
>> - enum rpu_tcm_comb tcm_mode)
>> -{
>> - int ret;
>> -
>> - ret = zynqmp_pm_set_rpu_mode(r5_core->pm_domain_id, fw_reg_val);
>> - if (ret < 0) {
>> - dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to set RPU mode\n");
>> - return ret;
>> - }
>> -
>> - ret = zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config(r5_core->pm_domain_id, tcm_mode);
>> - if (ret < 0)
>> - dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to configure TCM\n");
>> -
>> - return ret;
>> -}
>> -
>> /*
>> * zynqmp_r5_rproc_start()
>> * @rproc: single R5 core's corresponding rproc instance
>> @@ -761,6 +731,103 @@ static struct zynqmp_r5_core *zynqmp_r5_add_rproc_core(struct device *cdev)
>> return ERR_PTR(ret);
>> }
>>
>> +static int zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node_from_dt(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
>> +{
>> + int i, j, tcm_bank_count, ret, tcm_pd_idx, pd_count;
>> + struct of_phandle_args out_args;
>> + struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> + struct platform_device *cpdev;
>> + struct mem_bank_data *tcm;
>> + struct device_node *np;
>> + struct resource *res;
>> + u64 abs_addr, size;
>> + struct device *dev;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < cluster->core_count; i++) {
>> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[i];
>> + dev = r5_core->dev;
>> + np = r5_core->np;
>> +
>> + pd_count = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, "power-domains",
>> + "#power-domain-cells");
>> +
>> + if (pd_count <= 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "invalid power-domains property, %d\n", pd_count);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* First entry in power-domains list is for r5 core, rest for TCM. */
>> + tcm_bank_count = pd_count - 1;
>> +
>> + if (tcm_bank_count <= 0) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "invalid TCM count %d\n", tcm_bank_count);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + r5_core->tcm_banks = devm_kcalloc(dev, tcm_bank_count,
>> + sizeof(struct mem_bank_data *),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!r5_core->tcm_banks)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + r5_core->tcm_bank_count = tcm_bank_count;
>> + for (j = 0, tcm_pd_idx = 1; j < tcm_bank_count; j++, tcm_pd_idx++) {
>> + tcm = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct mem_bank_data),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!tcm)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + r5_core->tcm_banks[j] = tcm;
>> +
>> + /* Get power-domains id of TCM. */
>> + ret = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, "power-domains",
>> + "#power-domain-cells",
>> + tcm_pd_idx, &out_args);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(r5_core->dev,
>> + "failed to get tcm %d pm domain, ret %d\n",
>> + tcm_pd_idx, ret);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + tcm->pm_domain_id = out_args.args[0];
>> + of_node_put(out_args.np);
>> +
>> + /* Get TCM address without translation. */
>> + ret = of_property_read_reg(np, j, &abs_addr, &size);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get reg property\n");
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Remote processor can address only 32 bits
>> + * so convert 64-bits into 32-bits. This will discard
>> + * any unwanted upper 32-bits.
>> + */
>> + tcm->da = (u32)abs_addr;
>> + tcm->size = (u32)size;
>> +
>> + cpdev = to_platform_device(dev);
>> + res = platform_get_resource(cpdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, j);
>> + if (!res) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to get tcm resource\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> +
>> + tcm->addr = (u32)res->start;
>> + tcm->bank_name = (char *)res->name;
>> + res = devm_request_mem_region(dev, tcm->addr, tcm->size,
>> + tcm->bank_name);
>> + if (!res) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "failed to request tcm resource\n");
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> /**
>> * zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node()
>> * Ideally this function should parse tcm node and store information
>> @@ -839,9 +906,16 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster,
>> struct zynqmp_r5_core *r5_core;
>> int ret, i;
>>
>> - ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster);
>> - if (ret < 0) {
>> - dev_err(dev, "can't get tcm node, err %d\n", ret);
>> + r5_core = cluster->r5_cores[0];
>> +
>> + /* Maintain backward compatibility for zynqmp by using hardcode TCM address. */
>> + if (device_is_compatible(dev, "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss"))
>
> The previous patch moved the definition of the R5FSS to the new bindings but
> this is forcing to use the old bindings - did I something?
Hi Mathieu,
We need to maintain backward compatibility for zynqmp device. So, using old bindings
for zynqmp. For new devices (Versal and Versal-NET) new bindings are enforced in driver.
It's not recommended to map two programming sequences to same device. So for
"xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss" device old bindings are used.
Device tree is matching with new bindings. But that's hardware description. I believe,
driver can still choose to use hardcode addresses to maintain backward compatibility.
The end result will be same.
Thanks,
Tanmay
>
>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node(cluster);
>> + else
>> + ret = zynqmp_r5_get_tcm_node_from_dt(cluster);
>> +
>> + if (ret) {
>> + dev_err(dev, "can't get tcm, err %d\n", ret);
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -856,12 +930,18 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_core_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster,
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> - ret = zynqmp_r5_set_mode(r5_core, fw_reg_val, tcm_mode);
>> - if (ret) {
>> - dev_err(dev, "failed to set r5 cluster mode %d, err %d\n",
>> - cluster->mode, ret);
>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_rpu_mode(r5_core->pm_domain_id, fw_reg_val);
>> + if (ret < 0) {
>> + dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to set RPU mode\n");
>> return ret;
>> }
>> +
>> + if (device_is_compatible(dev, "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss") ||
>> + of_find_property(dev_of_node(dev), "xlnx,tcm-mode", NULL)) {
>> + ret = zynqmp_pm_set_tcm_config(r5_core->pm_domain_id, tcm_mode);
>> + if (ret < 0)
>> + dev_err(r5_core->dev, "failed to configure TCM\n");
>> + }
>> }
>>
>> return 0;
>> @@ -906,16 +986,25 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_cluster_init(struct zynqmp_r5_cluster *cluster)
>> * fail driver probe if either of that is not set in dts.
>> */
>> if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE) {
>> - tcm_mode = PM_RPU_TCM_COMB;
>> fw_reg_val = PM_RPU_MODE_LOCKSTEP;
>> } else if (cluster_mode == SPLIT_MODE) {
>> - tcm_mode = PM_RPU_TCM_SPLIT;
>> fw_reg_val = PM_RPU_MODE_SPLIT;
>> } else {
>> dev_err(dev, "driver does not support cluster mode %d\n", cluster_mode);
>> return -EINVAL;
>> }
>>
>> + if (device_is_compatible(dev, "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss")) {
>> + if (cluster_mode == LOCKSTEP_MODE)
>> + tcm_mode = PM_RPU_TCM_COMB;
>> + else
>> + tcm_mode = PM_RPU_TCM_SPLIT;
>> + } else if (of_find_property(dev_node, "xlnx,tcm-mode", NULL)) {
>> + ret = of_property_read_u32(dev_node, "xlnx,tcm-mode", (u32 *)&tcm_mode);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> +
>> /*
>> * Number of cores is decided by number of child nodes of
>> * r5f subsystem node in dts. If Split mode is used in dts
>> @@ -1100,6 +1189,8 @@ static int zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> /* Match table for OF platform binding */
>> static const struct of_device_id zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match[] = {
>> { .compatible = "xlnx,zynqmp-r5fss", },
>> + { .compatible = "xlnx,versal-r5fss", },
>> + { .compatible = "xlnx,versal-net-r52fss", },
>> { /* end of list */ },
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, zynqmp_r5_remoteproc_match);
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
