On 29/03/2024 11:27, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 1:45 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> virtio core already sets the .owner, so driver does not need to.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Depends on the first patch.
>> ---
>> drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c | 1 -
>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c
>> index fcc5e8c08973..9fae8e396c58 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-virtio.c
>> @@ -653,7 +653,6 @@ static struct virtio_driver virtio_gpio_driver = {
>> .remove = virtio_gpio_remove,
>> .driver = {
>> .name = KBUILD_MODNAME,
>> - .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>> },
>> };
>> module_virtio_driver(virtio_gpio_driver);
>>
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
>
> Applied, thanks!
I expressed dependency in two places: cover letter and this patch.
Please drop it, because without dependency this won't work. Patch could
go with the dependency and with your ack or next cycle.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
