On Wed, Jan 03, 2024 at 02:11:25PM -0800, Tanmay Shah wrote:
> This patch enhances rproc_put() to support remoteproc clusters
> with multiple child nodes as in rproc_get_by_phandle().
>
> Signed-off-by: Tarak Reddy <tarak.reddy@xxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Tanmay Shah <tanmay.shah@xxxxxxx>
As described in the first patch, this documents that Tarak first
certified the origin of this patch, then you certify the origin as you
handle the patch.
But according to From: you're the author, so how could Tarak have
certified the origin before you authored the patch?
Either correct the author, or add Co-developed-by, if that's what
happened.
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> index 0b3b34085e2f..f276956f2c5c 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> @@ -2554,7 +2554,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_free);
> */
> void rproc_put(struct rproc *rproc)
> {
> - module_put(rproc->dev.parent->driver->owner);
> + if (rproc->dev.parent->driver)
> + module_put(rproc->dev.parent->driver->owner);
> + else
> + module_put(rproc->dev.parent->parent->driver->owner);
> +
This does however highlight a bug that was introduced by patch 1, please
avoid this by squashing the two patches together (and use
Co-developed-by as needed).
Regards,
Bjorn
> put_device(&rproc->dev);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(rproc_put);
> --
> 2.25.1
>
