Re: [PATCH 08/14] soc: qcom: smem: Add qcom_smem_is_available()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 05, 2023 at 08:53:21PM +0200, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> 
> 
> On 5.06.2023 09:08, Stephan Gerhold wrote:
> > Avoid having to look up a dummy item from SMEM to detect if it is
> > already available or if we need to defer probing.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stephan Gerhold <stephan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  drivers/soc/qcom/smem.c       | 9 +++++++++
> >  include/linux/soc/qcom/smem.h | 1 +
> >  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/smem.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/smem.c
> > index b0d59e815c3b..3d93a6681494 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/smem.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/smem.c
> > @@ -359,6 +359,15 @@ static struct qcom_smem *__smem;
> >  /* Timeout (ms) for the trylock of remote spinlocks */
> >  #define HWSPINLOCK_TIMEOUT	1000
> >  
> > +/**
> > + * qcom_smem_is_available() - Checks if SMEM is available
> > + */
> Shouldn't kerneldoc explicitly say "returns x if y else z"?
> 

Seems like yes but I copy-pasted from other examples in this file and
there it is always missing. I'll add something simple in v2.

Thanks,
Stephan



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux