Hello Krzysztof, On 5/30/23 13:50, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 23/05/2023 11:13, Arnaud Pouliquen wrote: >> Rework compatibility description according to the support of >> the authenticated firmware relying on OP-TEE authentication. >> >> The expected behavior is: >> - with legacy compatible "st,stm32mp1-m4" the Linux kernel loads a >> non-signed (ELF) firmware image, >> - with compatible "st,stm32mp1-m4-tee" the Linux kernel load a signed >> firmware image. In this case it calls TEE services to manage the firmware >> loading and the remoteproc life-cycle. >> >> Signed-off-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> .../bindings/remoteproc/st,stm32-rproc.yaml | 33 +++++++++++++++++-- >> 1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Please use scripts/get_maintainers.pl to get a list of necessary people > and lists to CC. It might happen, that command when run on an older > kernel, gives you outdated entries. Therefore please be sure you base > your patches on recent Linux kernel. > > You missed at least DT list (maybe more), so this won't be tested. > Please resend and include all necessary entries. > > Because of above and RFC, I assume there is no need for review. Just to > be clear - that's a no. I did not add DT list and maintainers intentionally to avoid that you review it. As in a first step the associated OP-TEE pull request has to be reviewed. And my plan was just to share the Linux implementation part until the OP-TEE review cycle is finished. Now regarding your mail (and very interesting feedback from Christoph Hellwig), it was clearly not the good strategy. So my apologize and next time whatever the objective of the series I will add all peoples and lists in the loop. Thanks, Arnaud > > Best regards, > Krzysztof >
