On 04/05/2023 20:44, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> The .remove() callback for a platform driver returns an int which makes
> many driver authors wrongly assume it's possible to do error handling by
> returning an error code. However the value returned is (mostly) ignored
> and this typically results in resource leaks. To improve here there is a
> quest to make the remove callback return void. In the first step of this
> quest all drivers are converted to .remove_new() which already returns
> void.
>
> Trivially convert this driver from always returning zero in the remove
> callback to the void returning variant.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Caleb Connolly <caleb.connolly@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> index 8e15e4f85de1..70bffc9f33f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> @@ -2110,7 +2110,7 @@ static int q6v5_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static int q6v5_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static void q6v5_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct q6v5 *qproc = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> struct rproc *rproc = qproc->rproc;
> @@ -2128,8 +2128,6 @@ static int q6v5_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> q6v5_pds_detach(qproc, qproc->proxy_pds, qproc->proxy_pd_count);
>
> rproc_free(rproc);
> -
> - return 0;
> }
>
> static const struct rproc_hexagon_res sc7180_mss = {
> @@ -2482,7 +2480,7 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, q6v5_of_match);
>
> static struct platform_driver q6v5_driver = {
> .probe = q6v5_probe,
> - .remove = q6v5_remove,
> + .remove_new = q6v5_remove,
> .driver = {
> .name = "qcom-q6v5-mss",
> .of_match_table = q6v5_of_match,
--
Kind Regards,
Caleb (they/them)
