Re: [PATCH 2/2] rpmsg: glink: Consolidate TX_DATA and TX_DATA_CONT

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 3/27/2023 7:41 AM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
Rather than duplicating most of the code for constructing the initial
TX_DATA and subsequent TX_DATA_CONT packets, roll them into a single
loop.

Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <quic_bjorande@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c | 46 +++++++++----------------------
  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
index 62634d020d13..082cf7f4888e 100644
--- a/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
+++ b/drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c
@@ -1309,7 +1309,7 @@ static int __qcom_glink_send(struct glink_channel *channel,
  	int ret;
  	unsigned long flags;
  	int chunk_size = len;
-	int left_size = 0;
+	size_t offset = 0;
if (!glink->intentless) {
  		while (!intent) {
@@ -1343,49 +1343,29 @@ static int __qcom_glink_send(struct glink_channel *channel,
  		iid = intent->id;
  	}
- if (wait && chunk_size > SZ_8K) {
-		chunk_size = SZ_8K;
-		left_size = len - chunk_size;
-	}
-	req.msg.cmd = cpu_to_le16(GLINK_CMD_TX_DATA);
-	req.msg.param1 = cpu_to_le16(channel->lcid);
-	req.msg.param2 = cpu_to_le32(iid);
-	req.chunk_size = cpu_to_le32(chunk_size);
-	req.left_size = cpu_to_le32(left_size);
-
-	ret = qcom_glink_tx(glink, &req, sizeof(req), data, chunk_size, wait);
-
-	/* Mark intent available if we failed */
-	if (ret) {
-		if (intent)
-			intent->in_use = false;
-		return ret;
-	}
-
-	while (left_size > 0) {
-		data = (void *)((char *)data + chunk_size);
-		chunk_size = left_size;
-		if (chunk_size > SZ_8K)
+	while (offset < len) {
+		chunk_size = len - offset;
+		if (chunk_size > SZ_8K && (wait || offset > 0))

offset > 0 seems to be a new condition compared to the previous logic.
Are we adding this as a cached check because we know if offset is set then fragmented sends are allowed?

I don't think wait would have changed during the loop, so I'm not sure if offset > 0 is adding any extra value to the check.

  			chunk_size = SZ_8K;
-		left_size -= chunk_size;
- req.msg.cmd = cpu_to_le16(GLINK_CMD_TX_DATA_CONT);
+		req.msg.cmd = cpu_to_le16(offset == 0 ? GLINK_CMD_TX_DATA : GLINK_CMD_TX_DATA_CONT);
  		req.msg.param1 = cpu_to_le16(channel->lcid);
  		req.msg.param2 = cpu_to_le32(iid);
  		req.chunk_size = cpu_to_le32(chunk_size);
-		req.left_size = cpu_to_le32(left_size);
+		req.left_size = cpu_to_le32(len - offset - chunk_size);
- ret = qcom_glink_tx(glink, &req, sizeof(req), data,
-				    chunk_size, wait);
-
-		/* Mark intent available if we failed */
+		ret = qcom_glink_tx(glink, &req, sizeof(req), data + offset, chunk_size, wait);
  		if (ret) {
+			/* Mark intent available if we failed */
  			if (intent)
  				intent->in_use = false;
-			break;
+			return ret;
  		}
+
+		offset += chunk_size;
  	}
-	return ret;
+
+	return 0;
  }
static int qcom_glink_send(struct rpmsg_endpoint *ept, void *data, int len)



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Photo Sharing]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux