On 27/03/2023 20:37, Dylan Van Assche wrote:
> SLPI remoteproc initialization is the same for SDM845, SM8150, SM8250,
> SM8350 but is duplicated for each compatible. Refactor initialization
> structs for these 4 compatibles as a single struct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dylan Van Assche <me@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c | 66 ++++--------------------------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
> index d82b6f4bced4..d1c7baec4aca 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c
> @@ -1014,7 +1014,7 @@ static const struct adsp_data sc8180x_mpss_resource = {
> .ssctl_id = 0x12,
> };
>
> -static const struct adsp_data slpi_resource_init = {
> +static const struct adsp_data msm_slpi_resource_init = {
> .crash_reason_smem = 424,
> .firmware_name = "slpi.mdt",
> .pas_id = 12,
> @@ -1028,7 +1028,7 @@ static const struct adsp_data slpi_resource_init = {
> .ssctl_id = 0x16,
> };
>
> -static const struct adsp_data sdm845_slpi_resource = {
> +static const struct adsp_data sm_slpi_resource_init = {
You just added this and further lines. First refactor, then add new
device support.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
