On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 at 11:52, Manikanta Mylavarapu <quic_mmanikan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 3/22/2023 3:51 PM, Robert Marko wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Mar 2023 at 11:19, Manikanta Mylavarapu > > <quic_mmanikan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> On 3/7/2023 9:09 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >>> Why exactly do you need a new driver for this instead of extending > >>> existing PIL? I feel all this is growing because no one wants to touch > >>> existing code and merge with it... > >> > >> Previously we raised patch to add secure-pil to existing rproc driver. > >> Bjorn suggested to introduce a new secure-pil driver. > >> > >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-arm-msm/patch/1611984013-10201-3-git-send-email-gokulsri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/ > >> > >> > >> Also IPQ5018, IPQ9574 soc's follows multipd model. So we decided to > >> have new driver which consists 'secure-pil + multi pd' in one > >> place. > > > > Would it be possible to have IPQ8074 and IPQ6018 support in it as well? > > Cause, those are supported by ath11k but remoteproc support is missing, > > I have been upstreaming parts for IPQ8074 for years now and it is usable but > > we are still missing remoteproc. > > > > Regards, > > Robert > > >> > >> Thanks & Regards, > >> Manikanta. > > Yes. It's possible. Currently we added support for IPQ5018, IPQ9574. > In subsequent patches, we will add IPQ8074, IPQ6018 & IPQ5332 support > as well. Great, that is rather nice to hear. Regards, Robert > > Regards, > Manikanta.
